Lane County Mugshots ©

By  Michael Weber Feb. 15, 2026 - 9:45  pm The Nancy Guthrie disappearance feels like two cases layered on top of each other. On the surface, it is a straightforward abduction: an 84-year-old woman with limited mobility is taken from her home in the early morning hours of February 1, 2026. A masked, armed individual is captured on her doorbell camera disabling the device at 1:47 a.m.; motion is detected at 2:12 a.m.; her pacemaker app disconnects from her watch (left inside) at 2:28 a.m., placing her outside Bluetooth range; blood matching her DNA is found at the entrance with a visible trail; her phone, medications, and other belongings remain behind; and multiple ransom notes later demand millions in Bitcoin from media outlets, with deadlines that have now passed without any verified proof of life. Beneath that surface, the known details align with a theoretic scenario in which a close family member, someone with intimate knowledge of the property, Nancy’s routine, and the h...

By  Michael Weber Feb. 5, 2026  3:00 pm In my view, Nancy Guthrie's abduction was an inside job orchestrated by a close family member, specifically her son-in-law, driven by the motive of collecting insurance or inheritance money. This explains the lack of forced entry, as the perpetrator would have easy access without raising alarms. As a frequent visitor to her home (including dropping her off that very evening), their DNA and fingerprints would already be present everywhere, eliminating any concern about leaving traces behind. The timeline supports a scenario of hesitation and second thoughts. After the doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 a.m., there's a gap until just before the pacemaker signal stopped syncing with her Apple Watch around 2:28 a.m. I believe this period was spent wavering, questioning whether to follow through with the plan, since nothing was stolen and the scene doesn't suggest a rushed, professional kidnapping. Evidence at the scene reinforces foul p...